Connie Pillich accepts 2nd racist donation

Dear fellow tax hikers, while reviewing campaign finance reports we discovered that State Representative Connie Pillich has accepted a second campaign contribution from a known racist.  Earlier this year we reported that Rep. Pillich took $1000 on March 13, 2012 from racist State Representative Bob Hagan.  We have since discovered that Connie took another $500 from the racist on January 24, 2012. 

Hagan revealed his racist beliefs during a facebook debate when he referred to a black man as "buckwheat" because this gentleman had the nerve to disagree with the State Rep.  Isn't a black man supposed to know that he is to never argue with his white Democrat superiors?  At least that's how Hagan sees it.

Proving that this wasn't a misstatement, when Hagan was given the opportunity to apologize he refused and resorted to uttering more profane statements.  It's very simple - if someone slips up and makes a racial slur he/she feels doesn't represent his/her true beliefs, that person will quickly apologize for his/her offensive remark.  If they don't, it means they feel the remark was appropriate.  Hagan strongly believes it is ok to use racial slurs to disparage a black man who disagrees with him.

Connie Pillich herself does not have a problem with racial slurs.  If she did, she would return the $1500 she has collected from racist State Representative Hagan.  As it stands today, Connie is happily taking large campaign donations from a man who made a racial slur and refused to apologize for it.  That's our Connie Pillich.  We mean to say, that's our white woman Connie Pillich!

Known racist donates to Pillich

Dear fellow tax hikers, while reviewing campaign finance reports we discovered that State Representative Connie Pillich recently accepted a $1,000 donation from known racist Bob Hagan.  Hagan is a Democratic State Representative who was caught on Facebook using a racial slur to put down a black man who dared to disagree with him.

After this man, who is clearly black, disagreed with the honorable State Representative, Hagan responded with the following racial slur:

I ran against Traficant buckwheat....so take your personal comments and shove them where the sun dont shine

Hagan was very proud of his remarks.  When given the chance to apologize after the fact, Hagan responded with more slurs:

"They are so full of shit,” he said. “They’re so negative, these teabaggers."

That's right!  It's the Tea Party's fault that Bob Hagan used a racial slur.  It's the Tea Party's fault that Hagan refused to apologize for it, and later used profane language to describe the victims of his slur.  It's the Tea Party's fault that he referred to others as "teabaggers", another slur which he hasn't apologized for using.

Connie Pillich has some of her own racial problems.  Earlier this year Pillich insinuated that minorities are incapable of moving out of "the city" without a government program.  She did not appear to believe that minorities can move themselves into the neighborhood of their choice unless there is a white overseer to do it for them.  It should be noted that Pillich herself lives in a community that is only 2.7% black.  She clearly doesn't want "those people" living as equals around her. 

Bob Hagan and Connie Pillich are two peas in a pod.  They want to ensure the minorities know their role, which is basically carrying out the wishes of white Democratic leaders without question.  We are delighted to see Hagan helping Pillich.  While those two are especially paternalistic towards minorities, ultimately they know that all of us need the government to spend our money and run our lives for us.  Preferably, a government run by white Democrats such as them.

Is Connie Pillich a racist?

Dear fellow tax hikers, we have received some very interesting information about State Representative Connie Pillich and her real views about minorities.  In recent weeks the State House took up discussion on HB 408, legislation which would add two suburban voices to the 5-person CMHA Board.  Our awful Hamilton County Commissioner Chris Monzel traveled to Columbus to testify in favor it, which led to an exchange with Rep. Pillich.

According to the Gongwer news review of the testimony, Pillich asked Monzel if one of the concerns behind this legislation is the possibility of black people moving into predominantly white townships.

Rep. Connie Pillich (D-Montgomery) asked whether another concern involved issues with the potential for predominantly black CHMA residents moving into predominantly white townships.

Our sources tell us Pillich's questions were even more confrontational than reported by that news service.  They tell us Pillich asked Monzel if his real goal isn't to stop black people from moving out into the suburbs. 

Is Connie Pillich suggesting that black people can't move out of "the city" without a government program to do it for them?  Is she saying black citizens are incapable of locating themselves into their chosen neighborhood? 

Let's take a look at the record of these two individuals when it comes to their willingness to live near black people.  Pillich lives in the city of Montgomery.  According to the 2010 Census, Montgomery is 2.7% black.  For most of the past 15 years, Monzel has lived in Cincinnati, which is 44.8% black.  Should we ask our numbers crew to tell us which of these two has a problem living near black people and which one doesn't? 

We don't believe Pillich is a racist.  We believe she loves minorities, when they show up to the polls and vote for her.  She just doesn't want "those people" living near her.  That's our progressive white liberal Connie Pillich.